Baby Coverlet and Pillow Cover Set Philadelphia Area Early 1900s Bates Ivory and Blue

Y'all know near how individuals gain control of the ability of the Country and then corruption that power like former US President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some The states businesses.  He achieved this b y challenge Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons programme which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past Great britain Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the United states of america with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did non exist but which Blair claimed could exist deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that and then you lot will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade united states of america nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came nearly as a outcome of the interaction of three completely dissimilar factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be owing to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did kill people long agone.

This was especially the instance when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading illness: London's outset park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums U.k. The Independent Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would go on them safe from the threat of illness.  The majority of the population of unabridged countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" all the same contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, Britain, USA, Sweden.

Now y'all tin read a relatively brusk but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- UK, U.s. & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath notice the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells the states. Whatever vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific assay of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [run across tabular array below].  Leicester'due south arroyo also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Menstruation.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Ground forces (Great britain)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Army (Republic of india)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	xi.ane
British Ground forces (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Purple Navy	1860-1908	ii,909	234	8.0
Chiliad Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.iii
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and so that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nippon, of the British Ground forces, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical written report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the reverse side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Pocket-size-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	sixteen.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	three,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	five.34	£two,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.10	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doc

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the thought of vaccination got its get-go. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Nigh present the aforementioned bones tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country doc and his backbone in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year old boy named James Phipps to exam his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came downwardly with a slight fever, but nix more than. Subsequently, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a full-blown, admitting mild, example of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner'due south idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Equally the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other archetype stories of the dauntless hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[ii]

But legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a belief, reach an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching information technology into the arms of healthy people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the exercise of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea backside inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better confronting the illness than if they contracted information technology at some peradventure less desirable time and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically expert. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could just exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, but there was all the same an estimated two-five% that died as a result.[four,5] Notwithstanding, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[half dozen] Merely, was the deviation in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it take had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had improve access to more nutritious nutrient and a cleaner environment than the majority of society?

There was 1 major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would accept been naturally. In a 1764 article the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious illness, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a centre where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[7]

Withal, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had get a very lucrative procedure information technology was enthusiastically connected past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

At present enters the hero of our fable. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect 1 from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-year-one-time boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox every bit a examination to run across if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, information technology was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with but rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would exist immune to smallpox, at that place were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Social club, Jenner was ridiculed over his exercise.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-scale-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the get-go there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the written report but decided to ignore the results considering they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was speedily embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to cover Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early on reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were withal dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month subsequently it was inoculated with pocket-sized-pox matter without effect, and a few months later on took confluent small-pox and died. two. A adult female-servant to Mr. Run a risk, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterward she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-scale-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of pocket-size-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. fourteen. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a directly claiming to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Pocket-size Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the virtually skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly bully.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But later on vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the exercise.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace it as a new form of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a doctor to have spoken out against it as Dr. Dark-brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] in that location was a great hubbub about the pocket-size-pox. It bankrupt out with the great epidemic to the due north . . . It pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-scale-pox before, and often severely; well-nigh to expiry; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, just fell upon great numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the existent small-pox later, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, merely as failures increased there was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed say-so, and there were calls to obtain fresh cloth directly from cows.[sixteen]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious status of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, at that place were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[xviii] This faulty conventionalities would upshot in the creation of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated information technology onto a moo-cow's udder. He so took pus from that moo-cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[nineteen] A afterward inquiry adamant that this was zero more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, merely there were also reports of deaths from other causes shortly later on vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a male child from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (nine days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; i cicatrix . . . the married woman of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged x weeks, and the son of a sugar bakery, anile 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I practise non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Every bit it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what information technology was promised to exist, refusals increased. In society to bargain with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to curb the problem of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-threescore, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the well-nigh severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted past Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years afterward the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years earlier.

Graph i: Boston smallpox mortality charge per unit from 1841 to 1880.

Past this bespeak, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would exist milder. Calls were so made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent md of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were beingness made by vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the forcefulness of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western earth.

The public vaccinators accept received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get near a quarter million. Other sums, too, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three yard 4 hundred and lx-nine cases of pocket-sized-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of 9 thousand 3 hundred and 90-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more one hundred and 20-2 thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany testify that between 1870 and 1885 one one thousand thousand vaccinated persons died from pocket-sized-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the groovy demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'south government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new authorities that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to x%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, in that location were dire predictions from the bulk of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible "massacre," particularly in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the bulk of the boondocks'southward residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an heart-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of almost a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated by a crucial examination of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since information technology abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted as a rubber procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph iii). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. Subsequently the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its loftier death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in v of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and after to as low as 1 in 380. The disease could still kill, but having become so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or pare eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death charge per unit was around 20%, every bit it had been historically. The tabular array also showed that subsequently 1896 the death charge per unit cruel off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as depression every bit 0.26% by 1908. As the balmy course of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild affliction of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small-scale communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because it often gives ascension to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced petty in the manner of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although at that place has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the ramble symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major consequence, the practise of smallpox vaccination continued from the fourth dimension of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a pare condition due to vaccination, at present being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist between one in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of iv to 40%.[35] However, they acknowledged that near cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. In that location were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had merely been one smallpox decease in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the U.s. post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is however occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military machine father later on the father was vaccinated. Later on a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor claret and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent besides required treatment and virus was establish all over the house.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been even higher. This report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.a.. If the deaths were this high in a state with a modern health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays across the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which in one case had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some futurity epidemic might put the states in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the general public is non curious plenty to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as virtually the merely medically promoted way to deal with disease, in that location were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is fabricated through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. One thousand. Oliphant, Grand.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the apply of Acerb acid in carmine fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to pocket-size pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable every bit a condom in small-pox than Belladonna in red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the ill and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterward breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while among those under ordinary handling the bloodshed was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar'due south ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to have care of other people with smallpox without fearfulness of contracting the affliction. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Over again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should be used three or iv times a 24-hour interval to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Social club, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the peachy men who for a century by take been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fearfulness of smallpox if he will have two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a solar day." The discussion may now be regarded equally closed, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple tree cider vinegar might seem silly, just just because most people accept been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, affliction-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected brute's (ordinarily a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the homo arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a illness that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the poly peptide that forms connective tissue in pare, basic, and claret vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the trunk is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve every bit mortar belongings cells together and, equally a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of Rex's Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient nutrition led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done downward with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gilt Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases every bit those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died as a result of their wounds accounted only for 1 percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as ruddy fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph five: England and Wales whooping coughing mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country dr. making a discovery that saved the globe from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. Just the true history shows u.s.a. a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific affliction. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely constructive alternative methods of sanitation, diet, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner's dandy discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the mantle has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more than vaccines seem like a practiced idea to you lot?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Physician, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Noesis and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford Academy Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
viii.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Example Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'south Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Md, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
xi."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-Dec, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
fourteen."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 583.
fifteen.William Cobbett, Communication to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of applied medicine, vol. xx, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Study on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morn Chronicle, Wednesday, Apr 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. four, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Spotter, Apr 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. West. Harman, Medico, "A Physician'southward Argument Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
xxx.J. Westward. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "How Modest-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles 5. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Communicable diseases as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United States," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. two, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practise of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book ane, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Doctor, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Pull a fast one on, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. one, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Forestall Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed nether: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Kid Wellness Condom, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

smithsimpal95.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post